Scroll down, past the welcome message, to find full list of links for POSTINGS on this website

Scroll down, past the welcome message, to find full list of links for POSTINGS on this website
Scroll down, past the welcome message, to find full list of links for POSTINGS on this website (in the sidebar to the left)

Translate

Search This Blog - Results shown BELOW Welcome Message


IMPORTANT WELCOME MESSAGE

Scroll down past message to view posted topics


“All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” - Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

“‘Tis strange – but true; for truth is always strange; Stranger than fiction.” - British poet Lord Byron (George Gordon Byron)

A lot of evidence concerning abuse and corruption connected with Children's Aid/Children Services/CPS and the various related government departments and non-government organizations (NGOs) has surfaced in both the U.S. and Canada - yet, over the years, nothing changed.

This indicated that there was a larger more powerful connection at play. It did not take long to find this bigger connection. However, in the early years, there were few people who would accept the reality of these larger global connections.

Most people do not want to believe that corruption and abuse against innocent families and children exists in Canada and the U.S.. They need to feel a sense of security in the society they live in, and that need is so great that most people will prefer to believe a lie rather than face the truth. They want to believe that such things only exist in third world countries !

Understanding that even the basics of the wickedness in Nova Scotia, Canada was hard for most people to accept, we originally limited the information we posted to local concerns. This way, at least, we hoped that we could begin educating Nova Scotians about the reality of abuse and corruption connected with Children's Aid/Children Services/CPS.

However, it broke our hearts to find testimonies from parent groups throughout North America and beyond who had worked years to inform the public and had attemped to change the system, as we had, with no success. They were frustrated and did not understand why, despite all the evidence that had come forward, nothing was done, nothing changed.

We felt they were owed an explanation, so, hopefully, now is the time for people to hear and accept the "Bigger Global Picture".

The powerful connections that are responsible for abusing our innocent families and children go to the highest levels that hides behind secrecy and secret organizations.
Countless people will hate the New World Order and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people." ~ H. G. Wells (1939)

Finally alternate media, first hand testimonies from people coming out of these evil organizations, and countless politicians began now declaring openly the plan for a New World Order and a one world government. Because of this, it is hoped that people will accept the evidence we are now posting concerning this evil global connection. Please view topics under "Bigger Picture" , "Agenda 21" , "Democracy Destroyed" etc .

Because of the push to form a One World Government, we are all connected in our struggle. What is being done elsewhere is being, or will be, done to us because it is the same global power which is working towards the destruction of our families and our children worldwide - And the corruption in Children's Aid/Children Services/CPS is is just one of the instruments they use to achieve this goal.

Thus far there are at least 8 powers that are struggling for this one world domination: the Illuminati, Communism, the Vatican, the Masons, the Islam extremists (understand these Islam extremists are killing fellow Islamic people who do not agree with their extreme views) and India, China, and Russia. They all use and manipulate each other but, ultimately, each wants ultimate control.

In the Christian Bible, it is prophesied that an evil Anti-Christ will set up a one World government utilizing a one world religion where all the people of the world will eventually be forced to worship him alone. It is difficult, at this time, to determine, for certain, if this Anti-Christ raises up from any of the 8 powers mentioned above or elsewhere. Please link here if you are interested in learning more about the Anti- Christ.

Over the years, we have seen the voice of the people shut down: Newspapers, and Radio stations, that were willing to write and broadcast critical articles and interviews against Children Services/CPS and government folded. And radio/media personalities, who allowed people to speak out against Children Services/CPS and the government, lost their jobs or were heavily curtailed.

Both the US and Canada have passed laws to remove our right and freedoms, including free speech: the Patriot Act, numerous Executive Orders nullifying the US Constitution. The latest US government grab for power is the NSAA that would allow the US government to put any US citizen in indefinate detention without charges or a trial.

Oath Keepers (military police and sheriffs loyal to the US Constitution - ready to defend the people against enemies "foreign or domestic" ) and some congress people, senators and US States have also taken a stand. Even concerned individuals have gone to the courts to fight the NSAA.

We believe the internet, as we know it, soon will be limited. Eventually internet use will be removed completely from the hands of the people. The time is short. The time to get this information out is now. No one is immune from the abuse of Children Services /New World Order/Agenda 21 etc. The victims can be your family, your children, your grandchildren, your nieces and nephews etc.

You cannot move away from this threat - It is global !You must not put your head in the sand! - There is a global plan to destroy the family unit and physical, sexual and mental abuse is an essential part of Trauma-Based Mind Control, one of the many mind control programs used by this global system to destroy our children. They are also using the more insidious Neuro Linquistic Programing (NLP) to alter people's value system. But the current and planned use of Electronic, Psychotronic Mind Control which can be used on people in mass is the most alarming of all ! Please view the many topics on this site under the title MIND CONTROL.

They want our children to rebel against us. They want the new generation to view the "state" as their parent.

But worse than all this, they want to kill off most of the people on this planet, and all under the guise of environmentally saving the planet. We have been declared the enemy - They openly state that we, and our children must be sacrificed for the greater good.

If this sounds extreme to you then it is because you have not been paying attention to the world events that are unfolding before your very eyes. You have been lulled into ignorance and apathy. The expansion of sports and sports arenas, the addiction to various social networks, the focus on celebraties on so called "news" shows. This has all been designed to placate the masses and to get your focus off politics and the changes that are being done to you and your family. Your attention has also been diverted to worrying about the economy and an "enemy" that shifts and changes to suit the political manipulating whims of a small powerful elite. - and this spell has been caste over you "by design". The people in the highest realm of this global power call us "stupid sheep", and we are being lead to the slaughter !

You must wake up NOW! Time is VERY short ! I suggest you start with the several topics listed under "Agenda 21" :

1. AGENDA 21/ Sustainable Development Explained: North America - US - Canada - Nova Scotia (It is recommended that you read this 1st)

2. AGENDA 21/ SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: Population Cut/ Cull (kill) Part 1
(They want to kill us, You should question, Vaccines, Fluoride, Water, GMOs, Chemtrails, Morgellons - GMO/Chemtrail desease.

3. AGENDA 21/ SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: Population Cut/ Cull (kill) Part 2
(Morgellons, Meat, Aspartame, No home gardens, Planned vitamin, mineral and organic food ban, Smart meters, Cancer cures, Pollution free energy and cars, Abortion, After birth abortion, Denying medical care, Killing our own troops, Gun control)

4. AGENDA 21/ SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: Pushback - People are waking up Part 1
(States, Governors, Sheriffs, )

5. AGENDA 21/ SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: Pushback - People are waking up Part 2
(Militia, Military, Whistleblowers)

6. Agenda 21/Sustainable Development: The Bigger picture

7. AGENDA 21/ SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: Political Takeover

8. AGENDA 21/ SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: Canada - New World Order (NWO)

If we do not WAKE UP, fight back, and win then you need to seriously prepare yourself and your family for, incarceration without trial, torture, persecution, and even death.

Did you know that Obama has declared Christians to be "potential domestic terrorists"? - Especially those who believe in the promised Second Coming of Jesus Christ, who, as it happens, according to the Bible, comes to put a stop to an evil one world government. http://youtu.be/c0kiSGKbljs

Maybe some of these Christians and Messianic Jews know something that is very important for these times and perhaps we should pay attention to what their holy books have to say about the "End Times" "End of the Age" etc. (the 3 1/2 to 7 years just before the return of Yeshua Ha Mashiach/ Jesus the Messiah or Anointed One.

For those who want to check this out, please LINK HERE (scroll down to topic list on the right) . Beautiful pictures, fab songs, great testimonies from ex- satanists, ex-witches, ex-illuminati, ex-islamists, Christ believing Jews, etc, archeological evidence for Biblical events and most important scriptures to help you, encourage you and guide you.

May you find the path to the Creator of the heaven and earth. He foresaw these days (view topics on the "End Times" in the link above) we are living in right now and He has instructed us clearly on what we must do and what we are NOT to do. ( "The Mark of the Beast" View all scriptures on this subject HERE Revelation 13: 11-17, 14: 9-11, 16: 2, 19:20, 20:4 . Acceptance of the mark is not a matter to be taken lightly. The Bible states that anyone who accepts the mark, that one must have to buy or sell, denies Christ in favor of a false god. This decision, once made, is irrevocable, and the consequences are everlasting. - ( LINK HERE to read in context with fab pictures and music)

Get yourselves educated. Get familiar with the law and the illegal and unconstituional actions of your government . Educate yourselves about the New World Order and Agenda 21. Get vocal with the government to protect your family and children. Get into the family court and bear witness to what is going on in the name of "justice".
Above written by - Reverend Niemoeller, a German Lutheran pastor who was arrested by the Gestapo and sent to the concentration camp Dachau in 1938.

Monday, March 05, 2012

0. . Foster Care Crisis Deepens

On This Page:

1.Overcrowding, lax screening and too few homes: foster care crisis deepens

2. National data lacking on numbers, services for foster kids in Canada







Overcrowding, lax screening and too few homes: foster care crisis deepens
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/arts-and-life/life/health/overcrowding-lax-screening-and-too-few-homes-foster-care-crisis-deepens-139634273.html
By: Sue Bailey and Alison Auld, The Canadian Press
Posted: 02/19/2012
Peter Dudding, executive director of the Child Welfare League of Canada, is shown in his Ottawa office on Friday Jan. 27, 2012. Some children are placed in foster care without full safety checks while others wind up in supervised apartments or overcrowded homes, say child advocates who warn of a deepening crisis across the country.

Some children are placed in foster care without full safety checks while others wind up in supervised apartments or overcrowded homes, say child advocates who warn of a deepening crisis across the country.

"There are problems when you hear people from the front line talking about the fact that we're placing kids in homes where the study hasn't been done," said Peter Dudding, executive director of the Child Welfare League of Canada. "We've got kids being placed in homes where the home is over the allowable number of children.

"This is just wrong. And it's dangerous."

British Columbia's children's advocate has reviewed the child welfare system extensively over the years, finding numerous instances of children being placed in homes that weren't adequately screened.

Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond, B.C.'s representative for children and youth, said some caregivers had criminal records involving sexual offences, but were used because the welfare system was desperate for a placement. [WHAT ! ! ! - Are they crazy? ]

In one case, a four-year-old girl was removed from the care of her aunt in 2006 after she was found to be neglected, malnourished and suffering from recurring physical abuse. An investigation found that the aunt had not been appropriately screened.

"My sense is that there have been some improvements, but I'm still seeing cases where people don't know how to do the screening or they're bypassing screening," she said of an overhaul of the provincial system in 2010 following one of her audits.

"In remote areas, we are still seeing social workers not getting access to criminal records."

Corinna Filion, a spokeswoman with the B.C. Ministry of Children and Family Development, said all foster parents in the province must complete a comprehensive screening and assessment process. Since 2010, she said the department has stepped up criminal record checks on foster parents to every three rather than five years, and an online system is expediting criminal record checks.

Bev Wiebe, a Winnipeg-based social services consultant and trainer specializing in foster care and child welfare, said complex procedures that are in place for criminal background and child abuse checks can take several weeks.

"When people get desperate ... sometimes kids get put into homes where those processes may not be complete," she said.

"If your name or birth date is the same or similar as someone who has a conviction, you now have to get fingerprinted and send that off to Ottawa for the full report. Well, that can take a long time."

Compounding the problem is the dwindling number of families willing to help increasingly troubled kids across Canada, Dudding says.

It has been the same story of a chronic crisis in foster care for most of his 42-year career in social work, he said from Ottawa, but "one that's getting worse, not better."

The [Child Welfare League?] league, a national agency [offshoot of Obama's Child Welfare League] that promotes the protection of vulnerable children, is in the midst of a three-year campaign called Every Child Matters. [Same campaign name as Obama] It includes efforts to recruit and keep foster families while improving training.

Dudding said repeated efforts to recruit more families have had limited success as policies fluctuate between a focus on family unification and what's best for the child. [If they were doing their job and following their own laws, both of these policies should be part of the same goal !]

Child advocates disagree on potential solutions. Some say the heightened demands of fostering should be recognized with post-secondary training requirements and salaries. Others say related costs would be prohibitive.

Observers of a stressed-out system agree on one thing: the cost of doing nothing. Children who spend time in foster care are less likely to finish high school and are over-represented in the criminal justice system. [Because many are abused neglected and drugged up in foster care !]

Complicating any debate on reform is the lack of reliable national statistics for how many children are in care and how they're doing. Those numbers rely on reporting from provinces that have jurisdiction over child welfare but define foster care differently.

Dudding said the best estimate from two compilation studies is that [ in Canada] between 76,000 and 85,000 kids are in foster care.

The lack of data means there's no way the provinces, which fund foster care and often stake decisions on statistics and outcomes, can compare themselves against each other for best practices, he said.

"It's impossible to create good policy without good numbers."

Pressure on foster parents continues to grow without adequate help from child welfare agencies or provincial governments, Wiebe said.

"There are thousands of people who do it just because they care, and can they do it adequately? Not always. Do they get the training they need? Not usually," she said. [I have heard people confess that they do it for the money - I know single parent foster moms with minimum wage jobs who have bought houses with the money they bleed from the system.]

"We need to find a way to support these people better, both financially and with training, education and daily support."

Foster care rates differ by province, but tend to range from $23 to just over $30 a day depending on the age of the child. Extra money is paid for specific requirements, recreation or other factors.

"Nobody raises a kid on $30 a day," said Wiebe.

Brian Williams, president of the New Brunswick Foster Families Association, says the number of families is dropping off as costs rise, compensation stalls and children's issues become more complex. [Numbers are also dropping off because the news is getting out about the corrupt system and many people do not want to be part of it - And once in it, you can be easily victimized too!]

They range across Canada from fetal alcohol syndrome to gang involvement, addiction, attachment issues, autism and sexual abuse, [and children who are sexual abusers].

"We're now getting kids that are having mental health issues or substance abuse or were traumatized by violence," said Williams, who at age 60 is fostering two children under age two. [Yet they will often fight birth grandparents in court and will not allow them to have their own grandchildren strictly because of there age]

The demands are often too much for parents who both work outside the home [So are we suppose to go back to the 50s ? OR do something about the economy so both parents don't have to work] , adds Wiebe, who says the increase in kids' needs is "mind-blowing."

The state of foster care in Manitoba made headlines in November 2006 when children being temporarily housed in hotel rooms were moved to make way for an influx of guests arriving for the Grey Cup football championship. [Placement of children in low-rate hotels happens in Nova Scotia - We've seen them.]

Since then, the province has increased placement options through a recruitment campaign, says a government statement.

But the province continues to use "places of safety" including "agency staff residences, rooms and apartments" for about 700 of the 6,200 children in care, it says.

Foster homes are licensed in Manitoba based on criminal records screening and other safeguards.

Newfoundland and Labrador in 2009 created a new [?] Child, Youth and Family Services department to overhaul the child protection system within three to five years.

The ministry is backed by a new Children and Youth Care and Protection Act, [We in Nova Scotia have learned the hard way that a new Act and fine sounding legal phrases are meaningless because the government does not even follow its own law!  But it will tout it out all the time for the media and quote from it as if they actually did. - We took the government to court over this - Won - But they still keep ignoring the law]  described as a child-centred approach to improve care options, quality and continuity while increasing social work staff and improving training. The province also raised rates for foster parents.

Children have not been temporarily placed in hotels in the province since the fall of 2010, says a statement from the department.

Still, 43 children in mid-January were living in apartments or houses with paid and screened supervisory staff because no foster or group home was available, the province confirmed. [ So instead of public hotels, they are being warehoused in private apartments or houses with paid staff - What the diff? ] On average, kids will wait about four months for a home placement unless they have extreme behavioural or other issues [So the number of 43 is just what is called a "Snap shot" statistic, taken on a single day, but, the fact is, virually all the children spent time in these sub-standard "temporary" facilities for 16 weeks!] .

Diane Molloy, executive director of the Newfoundland and Labrador Foster Families Association, is optimistic about provincial efforts so far, but said real change will take time. And there is still a shortage of at least 50 foster families, she said.

"There's no one who will tell you that's a good situation," Molloy said of children being housed in apartments with paid staff. "There's not a choice with the current climate.

"They have to go somewhere." [How about back home with services as stated in the law to help unify the families - they are quick to pay for these services when the children are in the system to foster parents but VERY reluctant to do so for the parents - YET the laws state that 1st and foremost these services are suppose to go to the birth parents.]

Saskatchewan has one of the country's highest numbers of children in care, with an estimated 500 of them in overcrowded foster homes at the end of 2010.

Bob Pringle, the children's advocate for the province, released a report last August listing some improvements in the system following an earlier study by his organization [ ?] outlining major flaws.

Still, Pringle says the province has lost 100 foster homes in the last 18 months and far too many homes exceed the limit of four children per home before it's considered "overcrowded."

"It's a crisis everywhere, so consequently there's a rush to overcrowd," said the former provincial minister of social services.

In 1995 when Pringle was in government, there were 1,700 children in care in Saskatchewan. When he did his child welfare review in 2009, that number had jumped to 5,000.

His group is also concerned that social workers are so overburdened that once children are placed in homes, there is little follow-up to ensure their safety or the families' ongoing ability to care for them.

"So the ministry cannot guarantee in our view that those children are safe," he said, adding that he's on the verge of investigating several high-profile deaths of children in care.

Tom Waldock specializes in child welfare and family studies at Nipissing University in Ontario and has fostered more than 50 children over 25 years.

He describes a declining care system that can no longer be patched with "Band-Aid kinds of solutions."

Quality care is a right cemented in Canada's international commitment to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Waldock said.

But the communal duty that is owed to the most vulnerable and troubled children gets lost in systemic inertia, bureaucracy and the fact that kids in care "don't have a lot of political clout," he added.

He said foster parents should receive training, increased recognition and more compensation — at least for those working with the most challenging children. [ 1st birth parents should receive training, increased recognition and more compensation ]

As for cost, Waldock cited the number of child welfare agencies that are now contracting out to private agencies to help supervise kids in apartments for lack of family placements.

"We're paying sometimes $200 and $300 a day to place kids in outside resources because we've failed to enhance the internal system," he said.

"You're talking about a hugely marginalized group of kids, so they fall through the cracks."


http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/arts-and-life/life/home_family/national-data-lacking-on-numbers-services-for-foster-kids-in-canada-139634083.html
Nelson Wyatt, The Canadian Press
Posted: 02/19/2012

MONTREAL - Anyone seeking a national snapshot of the average child in foster care in Canada, especially how their experiences helped shape their adult life, is flat out of luck.

[ Watch out for "snapshot" data. It is statistics for a certain date. What you need to know is that these dates are NOT randomly picked. The government knows the dates ahead of time and will shuffle children around ahead of time so the stats will show what they want to show or so the states are ay least better than they should be! ]
 No reliable national statistics exist on children in foster care in the country, a situation compounded by the differences in how data is collected at the provincial and territorial levels.
Nico Trocme

"We know ridiculously little about these kids," said Nico Trocme, who directs the Centre for Research on Children and Families at McGill University in Montreal.

"I can't answer a basic question like how many kids are in foster care in Canada," says Trocme, whose research is carried out in collaboration with a number of Canadian universities.

Trocme, who works with governments and social service agencies to help them target services, said corporations are often more rigorous at profiling their clientele.
Virginia Rowden

It can easily cost taxpayers $1 million to care for a child who comes into foster care as an infant and leaves when they're 20, says Virginia Rowden, social policy director for the Ontario Association of Children's Aid Societies.

"I want to know how that investment made a difference," she said. "We don't have a way of doing that."

Knowing how a child turned out can be helpful in determining the efficiency of services, she said.

"Are they working? Are they educated? Are they healthy? Are they forming their own families? Are they living on the street? Are they sick? We don't know those things."[ How convenient !]

The lack of reliable national data on kids in foster care in Canada is something that can pose a challenge to policy-makers, observers say.

"The real value of this information is it allows more reflection, more comparative understanding in producing successful outcomes," says Peter Dudding, the chief executive of the Child Welfare League of Canada.

Dudding said being able to compare jurisdictions allows governments and agencies to ask more pointed questions about services and how they're delivered.

Members of a Parliamentary committee studying adoption in Canada [ Who are these people and what is the committee? Why are they not named?]found the lack of national data was a hurdle in completing their work, Dudding said he was told.

"The first obstacle they ran into was the one around the lack of data," he said. The chairman of the committee declined to comment until its report is released. [Fine but as we asked what committee are we talking about here ? ]

Trocme said there is not a complete lack of information. Provinces and territories do track their charges to some extent.

"But every province categorizes foster care in a different way," he said. "Ontario is a good example. That information really falls at the level of different agencies. There's 15 agencies, they each count things differently."

Rowden said that three years ago her organization asked its members to help in a survey to determine how many of their wards had graduated from high school because there is no data.

Ninety-seven per cent of the agencies contributed, their staff having to manually check all their files for the information.

"What we found is ... that we have abysmal graduation rates for kids up to the age of 21," she said, adding data indicated that around 42 per cent graduated from high school.

A similar study two years later suggested that number had climbed to 44 per cent although Rowden said even that number is distorted.

Rowden said she'd actually like to see a better interpretation of existing data as well.

Dawn Levine, a spokeswoman for Ontario's Ministry of Children and Youth Services, says Ontario only tracks data on children and youths who have been wards of the province for two years or more.

Statistics, such as how many times the child has been in care or moved, educational progress and care plans, are compiled through annual reviews of these wards' cases.

Levine, who said fewer foster children are coming into care in Ontario recently, said the ministry regularly uses "inter-jurisdictional information" when devising policy.

"This includes identifying national trends and best practices related to family and child services," she said.

The federal Human Resources Department said it works with provinces on developing programs and services but it is up to the provinces to implement them when it comes to foster care.

"There is considerable diversity between jurisdictions on how these programs are delivered, making it difficult to compile statistics on a national level," an unidentified department spokesman said in an email response to questions.

Sheila Durnford, president of the Canadian Foster Family Association, said the need for reliable national statistics had come up in discussions with Human Resources when her group worked with the Child Welfare League on a program to recruit and train foster families across Canada.

"One of the things the federal government asked us to do was try to find out national statistics," she said. Although progress had been made, it wasn't easy.

"It's more involved than going into each province's statistics because each province does things so differently and some provinces do it better than others," said Durnford, who has been a foster parent for 25 years.

Durnford, who lives in Langley, B.C., said her province does a good job of collecting data but she sees the value in compiling national data, saying she believes it would help the care network develop. She pointed out it would also help greatly when it comes to funding.

"Whenever you're asking for funding from any government, they always work on statistics," she said.

[If you take some time reading this site you would know that more funding is NOT the answer - In fact it is the problem ! Children Services has become a big business. View video below. Link here to view othere videos. http://revealingtruthinnovascotia.blogspot.com/search/label/0.%20U.S.%20Senator%20Nancy%20Schaefer%20speaks%20out%20against%20Child%20Protective%20Services%20-%20The%20same%20things%20are%20happening%20in%20Nova%20Scotia There is a lot more info on this site stating the same.]

Nancy Schaefer
"The Unlimited Power of Child Protective Services"
Part 1 of 2


Nancy Schaefer
"The Unlimited Power of Child Protective Services"
Part 2 of 2

Sunday, March 04, 2012

Foster Mom, Susan Elizabeth MacDonnell almost Kills 2 year old Child

Susan Elizabeth MacDonnell of Dartmouth pleaded guilty this morning in Nova Scotia Supreme Court to abusing her [foster] daughter.

Questions: Who is the mystery husband who is never named?
Why is he not named?
Where was he when all this neglect and abuse was going on?

Foster mom admits she abused girl

http://thechronicleherald.ca/metro/29135-foster-mom-admits-she-abused-girl
November 3, 2011
By STEVE BRUCE Court Reporter

A Dartmouth [Nova Scotia, Canadawoman was trembling Thursday as she stood before a judge and admitted abusing her foster daughter.

Susan Elizabeth MacDonnell, 43, plead­ed guilty in Nova Scotia Supreme Court in Halifax [ Nova Scotia, Canada] to charges of aggravated assault and failing to provide the necessities of life.

The offences were committed between Feb. 1, 2010, and April 20, 2010, when the girl was not quite two years old. The child was hospitalized at the IWK Health Centre in Halifax at the time.

Justice Felix Cacchione ordered Mac-Donnell to return to court on March 1 for sentencing.

Crown attorney Catherine Cogswell said she will be seeking five years in prison for MacDonnell, who has no previous crimi­nal record.

“The allegations of the Crown, which will be read . . . in the agreed statement of facts, are that the child almost died as a result of being deprived of food for a leng­thy period of time," Cogswell said outside court.

“These are very serious and egregious criminal offences. That’s why we’re look­ing at what we perceive to be a lengthy period of incarceration, given her back­ground and lack of criminal record."

MacDonnell held hands with her hus­band on her way in and out of court Thursday. They had nothing to say to reporters.

She remains free on conditions that she not have any contact with children, con­sume alcohol or drugs or possess any weapons.

MacDonnell was arrested in June 2010 and remanded to the East Coast Forensic Hospital in Dartmouth for a psychiatric assessment.

Doctors said she was fit to stand trial and was not suffering from any mental disorder at the time of the offences that would have made her not criminally responsible for her actions.

Defence lawyer Jean Morris tried to have the case referred to the province’s mental health court in June but the Crown did not give the required consent so the charges stayed in Supreme Court.

The girl, now 3½ , has been placed with another family.

“She’s doing exceptionally well in the circumstances," Cogswell said of the child. “She bounced back medically, cog­nitively and developmentally once she was cared for and provided with food.

“As a lawyer, it’s difficult to grasp some of the medical concepts and appropriately explain them. My understanding is that the child was suffering malnutrition. As a result of that, once the medical profession­als started giving her food and proper nutrition, she suffered re-feeding syn­drome to the point that her body actually started to reject the food.

“It took minuscule amounts being pro­vided to her over time to allow her to absorb the food properly into her system and to recover."

MacDonnell was also charged with criminal negligence causing bodily harm and unlawfully causing bodily harm.

Those counts are expected to be dismissed in March.


Details of this story in chronological order:


Mother accused of injuring child to be assessed
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/story/2010/06/25/ns-mother-assessed.html
Friday, June 25, 2010
CBC News

A 42-year-old Dartmouth [Nova Scotia Canada] woman accused of injuring her daughter will be sent for a 21-day psychiatric assessment to see if she is criminally responsible for her actions.

The assessment will look into Susan MacDonnell's mental state at the time she allegedly deliberately harmed her two-year-old daughter Rachel.

MacDonnell has already been found fit to stand trial.

Police accuse MacDonnell of failing to provide the necessities of life, criminal negligence and unlawfully endangering the toddler's life.

There is a publication ban on evidence that led to the assessment order. [Why ?]



Alleged child abuser may not be criminally responsible
http://m.news957.com/Local/Article/70931
Doug Cogswell Jun 26, 2010

A woman charged with abusing her two-year-old daughter has been found fit to stand trial.

Susan Elizabeth MacDonnell, 42, went before a judge yesterday.

She now faces a 21 day psychiatric assessment to determine if she was criminally responsible at the time of the alleged offences.

A publication ban prevents the release of the exact details of the case but earlier this week the Chronicle-Herald reported MacDonnell is accused of removing her daughter's feeding tube and tampering with formula the toddler was getting while at the IWK.

The alleged offences took place between March of 2009 and April of this year [2010] when MacDonnell entered the mental health ward at the QE2.

Crown Attorney Catherine Cogswell tells CTV MacDonnell's been receiving psychiatric treatment since then and that why the second assessment was ordered.

"It was a combination of the unique aspects or the peculiarity of those facts combined with the fact that she's been under ongoing psychiatric care since the time of the allegations," she said. "As a result of reviewing the facts I became concerned about whether or not she had a psychiatric illness that would essentially render her not criminally responsible."

She is charged with aggravated assault, criminal negligence causing bodily harm and failing to provide the necessities of life.

The toddler is reported to be doing well.




Mother accused of injuring child fit for trial
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/story/2010/07/19/ns-mother-fit-for-trial.html
Monday, July 19, 2010
CBC News
Susan Elizabeth MacDonnell, shown here on July 19, 2010.

A psychiatric exam for a Dartmouth woman has found her fit to stand trial on charges of failing to provide the necessities of life to her two-year-old daughter.

In June, a judge ordered the 21-day assessment to assess the mental state of Susan MacDonnell, 42. She was charged after her daughter became more ill while being treated at the IWK Health Centre.

Police accuse her of failing to provide the necessities of life, criminal negligence and unlawfully endangering Rachel MacDonnell's life.

Susan MacDonnell will stay in hospital in Halifax for at least the next two months and is due in court in September to answer to the charges.

There is a publication ban on evidence that led to the psychiatric assessment order.


Mother released from custody
http://www.metronews.ca/halifax/local/article/582584--mother-released-from-custody
ALEX BOUTILIER
FOR METRO HALIFAX
July 20, 2010

A mother accused of assaulting her toddler has been released from custody. Susan Elizabeth MacDonnell of Dartmouth faces charges of aggravated assault, criminal negligence, and failure to provide the necessities of life to her two-year-old daughter. In June, MacDonnell was ordered to undergo a 21-day psychiatric evaluation to determine if she was criminally responsible for the acts. Conditions of her release include staying at the Abbie Lane mental health centre and refraining from contact with children under 18.



Mother may plead guilty to child-abuse charges
http://thechronicleherald.ca/front/19378-mother-may-plead-guilty-child-abuse-charges
October 6, 2011
By STEVE BRUCE Court Reporter
Susan Elizabeth MacDonnell, shown here on July 19, 2010, is negotiating a plea to charges involving a young child that include failing to provide the necessities of life, criminal negligence causing bodily harm, aggravated assault and unlawfully causing bodily harm.


A Dartmouth woman accused of harming her young daughter over a one-year period is negotiating a plea bargain with the Crown, a judge was told this morning.

Susan Elizabeth MacDonnell, 43, is charged with failing to provide the necessities of life, criminal negligence causing bodily harm, aggravated assault and unlawfully causing bodily harm.

The charges were docketed for Nova Scotia Supreme Court in Halifax [Nova Scotia, Canada] today for the purpose of setting trial dates, but defence lawyer Jean Morris informed the judge she's working out an agreed statement of facts with prosecutor Catherine Cogswell.

“I'm still negotiating some slight changes,” Morris said in asking for a one-week adjournment.

Justice Robert Wright went along with the request, saying: “I've looked at the file. It looks like there's some possibility of a resolution.”

MacDonnell, who was not present in court today, remains free on bail, with conditions that she not have any contact with children, consume alcohol or drugs or possess any weapons.

The Crown alleges that MacDonnell abused her daughter between March 1, 2009, and April 20, 2010.

The little girl was two years old when MacDonnell was arrested in June 2010 and remanded to the East Coast Forensic Hospital in Dartmouth for a psychiatric assessment. Doctors said she was fit to stand trial and was not suffering from any mental disorder at the time of the alleged offences that would have made her not criminally responsible for her actions.

This June, MacDonnell's lawyer tried to have the case referred to the province's mental health court, but the Crown did not give the required consent so the charges stayed in Supreme Court.





Court delayed again for mom accused of injuring child
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/story/2011/10/13/ns-macdonnell-court-proceedings.html
CBC News Posted: Oct 13, 2011
CBC NEWS

Crown prosecutor Catherine Cogswell says a trial must go forward against a foster mother accused of injuring her daughter.

Court proceedings involving a Dartmouth foster mother charged with injuring her two-year-old daughter were delayed again Thursday when the accused didn't show up for court.

Susan Elizabeth MacDonnell, 43, was first charged with criminal negligence causing bodily harm, as well as aggravated assault and failing to provide the necessities of life in June 2010.

MacDonnell waived her right to a preliminary hearing last spring and on Thursday when she didn't show up, the Crown insisted the court set a trial date.

"It's extremely frustrating from the Crown's perspective to continue to have this matter delayed at the request of Ms. Morris," said Crown prosecutor Catherine Cogswell, talking about MacDonnell's legal aid lawyer Jean Morris.

"This is a matter that is extremely serious. A young child — 22 months old — almost died," Cogswell told CBC News.

Other foster children in MacDonnell's household were also removed by the Department of Community Services.

Cogswell said it was expected that Morris and her client would enter a plea based on an agreed upon statement of facts. The two sides have been negotiating for weeks.

"I anticipated that Ms. MacDonnell would be here today, I anticipated there would be a change of plea and Ms. Morris informed us this morning that was not the case," Cogswell said.

Medical report

Instead, on Thursday the defence requested more time based on a medical report Morris claimed to have only recently received.

The Crown said Morris had received the report a year ago. Morris admitted that to be true, then apologized to the court.

Cogswell argued Thursday that while terms of the facts are close to being resolved, MacDonnell's charges are too serious for further delay.

"She adopted a special needs child and as a result of her care of that child in terms of manipulation and withholding the feeding tube from this child, the child almost died," Cogswell said.

"Were it not for the intervention of medical services and suspicion of medical services, then that child likely would have had much more serious consequences."

Those allegations have not yet been tested in court.

MacDonnell remains free on bail [ Why? !] and Cogswell said the little girl is doing well with her new family.

The next court date is in two weeks time, and two weeks have been set aside at the end of January [for trial] if there's no resolution.



Crown frustrated with delays in abuse case
http://thechronicleherald.ca/metro/24697-crown-frustrated-delays-abuse-case
October 14, 2011
STEVE BRUCE Court Reporter

A prosecutor is getting tired of waiting for a Dartmouth woman to take responsibility for allegedly abusing her young daughter.

Susan Elizabeth MacDonnell, 43, is charged with failing to provide the necessities of life, criminal negligence causing bodily harm, aggravated assault and unlawfully causing bodily harm.

She allegedly harmed the little girl between March 1, 2009, and April 20, 2010.

MacDonnell was expected to plead guilty to one of the charges Thursday in Nova Scotia Supreme Court in Halifax, but defence lawyer Jean Morris instead asked for one more adjournment.

Morris told the court that she wants a doctor’s report incorporated into an agreed statement of facts that she is working on with Crown attorney Catherine Cogswell.

The defence lawyer requested that the case be adjourned for two weeks.

Cogswell sprang out of her chair to voice her opposition to the defence motion.

"These are very serious charges before the court," the prosecutor said. "This is a situation where a woman adopted a child and almost killed her.

"Ms. Morris has continued to delay and delay and delay. The Crown is extremely frustrated."

Cogswell said the two sides are close to a resolution, so she could go along with a two-week delay, but she also asked the judge to block off some tentative dates for trial.

If necessary, the judge-alone trial will get underway in late January.

Justice Peter Rosinski ordered the lawyers to return to court Oct. 27.

MacDonnell did not attend court Thursday. She is free on conditions that she not have any contact with children, consume alcohol or drugs or possess any weapons.

The girl was two years old when MacDonnell was arrested in June 2010 and remanded to the East Coast Forensic Hospital in Dartmouth for a psychiatric assessment.

Doctors said she was fit to stand trial and was not suffering from any mental disorder at the time of the alleged offences that would have made her not criminally responsible for her actions.

MacDonnell’s lawyer tried to have the case referred to the province’s mental health court this June, but the Crown did not give the required consent, so the charges stayed in Supreme Court.



Susan Elizabeth MacDonnell and mystery husband

N.S. foster mom admits to starving child
Nov 3, 2011
CBC News

A Dartmouth, N.S., foster mother pleaded guilty Thursday to aggravated assault and failing to provide the necessities of life by denying food to her two-year-old foster daughter.

Susan Elizabeth MacDonnell, 43, was first charged in June 2010 with criminal negligence causing bodily harm, as well as the other two charges after the foster child became more ill while being treated at the IWK Health Centre in Halifax.

Crown attorney Catherine Cogswell told the court Thursday that the little girl nearly died after being hospitalized due to malnutrition.

The Crown will be seeking a five-year jail term when MacDonnell is sentenced on March 1. She is free on bail until then.

The criminal acts took place over a two-month period beginning in February 2010, after the little girl was hospitalized with dehydration and malnutrition.

Cogswell said the child, who has special needs, is doing well, but medical staff at the IWK Health Centre suspected wrongdoing when the child was slow to recover.

"The allegations of the Crown are that the child almost died as a result of being deprived of food for a lengthy period of time," she said.

At an earlier bail hearing, the Crown said MacDonnell admitted to disconnecting the child's feeding tube in the hospital, and to diluting a high glucose formula at least six times.

A psychiatric examination found the mother fit to stand trial. Defense lawyer, Jean Morris, has asked for a pre-sentence report to try and reduce the five-year jail term the Crown is seeking.

"Ms. MacDonnell has no criminal record. This is her first offense. That being said, these are very serious and egregious offenses. That's why we are looking at what we perceive as a lengthy period of incarceration," Cogswell said.

Other foster children in MacDonnell's household were also removed by the Department of Community Services.




Mother’s sentencing on abuse charges delayed until May
http://thechronicleherald.ca/metro/68919-mother-s-sentencing-abuse-charges-delayed-until-may
March 1, 2012

By STEVE BRUCE Court Reporter

Susan MacDonnell leaves Nova Scotia Supreme Court in Halifax with her [mystery] husband in November.


A Dartmouth woman’s sentencing for abusing her foster daughter has been postponed until May.

Susan Elizabeth MacDonnell, 43, pleaded guilty in Nova Scotia Supreme Court in Halifax in November to charges of aggravated assault and failing to provide the necessities of life.

The offences were committed between Feb. 1, 2010, and April 20, 2010, when the girl was hospitalized at the IWK Health Centre in Halifax because of dehydration and malnutrition.

MacDonnell was supposed to be sentenced Thursday, but her lawyer appeared in court three weeks ago to get an adjournment.

Defence lawyer Jean Morris told the court she was going to be away on vacation [ ? ! ] when legal briefs were due and that her client was experiencing delays in getting mental health treatment.

Crown attorney John Scott opposed the defence’s request, saying the prosecution was frustrated by the slow progress of the case.

Justice Pierre Muise chastised Morris for scheduling her vacation when she knew there was a conflict, but he granted the adjournment anyway.

The judge said he didn’t want to penalize the accused for her lawyer doing something that he viewed as “inappropriate.”

MacDonnell’s sentencing is now set for May 4. The Crown is expected to argue for a sentence of five years in prison.

The prosecution says the little girl almost died from being denied food for an extended period of time and that MacDonnell disconnected her feeding tube and diluted her formula at the hospital.

MacDonnell was arrested in June 2010 and remanded for a psychiatric assessment. A doctor said she was fit to stand trial and was not suffering from any mental disorder at the time of the offences that would have made her not criminally responsible.

The woman remains free on a $5,000 recognizance, with conditions including having no contact with children, not consume alcohol or drugs or possess any weapons.

The girl, now almost four, has been adopted by another family and is doing “exceptionally well,” according to the Crown.

Other foster children were also removed from MacDonnell’s home.

Thursday, February 23, 2012

A MUST READ for ALL Parents!!

A MUST READ for ALL Parents!!
http://sweetsusieg.hubpages.com/hub/A-MUST-READ-for-ALL-Parents

It really did start as a good thing.

In today’s state of affairs CPS workers (Child Protective Services) are coming into homes and taking children at an alarming rate. There are many things that can be said about CPS and most of them are not good. When CPS was first started it was designed for the betterment. Since we have learned and evolved in our parenting skills, we have become better parents.

Don't Mess With Texas CPS
"The family goes back to the age of savagery!" - quote from text book used to train social workers. Child protective Services is out of control. Their current method of operation is a Marxist soviet style system of unaccountable "Emergency" powers. No longer are parents allowed Due Process. Mere hearsay is enough for them to steal your kids.


Think it doesn't apply to you?

If you think that you are a good parent and they have nothing on you, think again. If you are a grand parent and think they can’t take away your grand children, think again. Look around your home, do you have wooden table? Anything with corners? Throw rugs? Sharp knives that are not locked away? Chemicals that are used for cleaning that are not under lock and key? Down to 1 egg in your egg tray? Do you have any enemies? Maybe a neighbor that is displeased with you? PLEASE read on!!


CPS Steals Children for Profit - Your Tax Dollars in Action!
Short video detailing abuse of power by Child Protective Services - CPS. Highlights financial incentives to steal kids and place them on drugs. Contains multiple news clips and interviews from families that CPS stole the kids from, and includes the late (possibly murdered) Nancy Schaefer.


Social Security? YES!

Two things are going on with CPS, first because we have become better parents they are needing to find justification for taking of children. The second, WHY do they need to take children? Because of the money involved. There is a LOT of money involved in children. Counseling for 'reunification' is no longer encouraged, in fact most often it is refused.

Our Federal U.S. Government is paying CPS to take children via Title IV D funding, or in other words Social Security. So when the day comes that you are told Social Security is broke and you are allowed no benefits, you will know this; All the money that you pay in each week goes, in part, to the removal of children from their homes.

Follow the money

Before I get into what is done with these children let explain the money. When a CPS worker becomes involved. Meaning when they open a case, the local office receives between $3,000 and $5,000 dollars per child - per month, from the Federal Government. The money just goes up from there. CPS can drag out cases for months. Then when they feel the money may be drying up from you (the client) they may take a good look at your children. Are they marketable? Are they cute, is it possible they can be adopted out?

What can and does happen

The first thing that can and does happen is you will be charged with something, anything. Please understand it does not have to be proven, not at all. The accusation is enough to remove your child/children. The most common charge is ‘failure to protect’. This can come from just about anything. After that, they can bring more charges and if they have made the 1st one, it is guaranteed they will come up with many others. NOT ONE CHARGE HAS TO BE PROVEN. A false accusation from ANYONE can bring CPS knocking at your door.

CPS workers are ‘above the Law’, there are no ramifications, no repercussions and they have no accountability. They are allowed BY LAW to say and do anything they please to take your children from your home. State Troopers LOVE to let CPS workers take charge because they do not have to have a warrant. All you have to do is open the door to them. Once they have entered your home, everything becomes suspect and they can and do remove anything they think they can charge you with. All without a warrant. Not only that, but you do NOT have to be read your Miranda rights.

More than likely you will be placed on the news with some sort of horror story that has been cooked up that will have you ostracized from the community. Your family and friends may turn against you because of the charges. Your spirit will be broken and all you will want is for ‘it to be over’, once you have come to that stage, they have you. You will do anything they tell you to do.

What happens to the children?

What happens to the children? At first they may be allowed to live with family members, but that will be short lived. They may be moved from foster care to foster care, those children who don’t want to leave their parents are labeled as mentally unstable and usually placed on large amounts of medication. Some of these become 'The Throw away’ children. Once they have forced, coerced or threatened you to sign off your parental rights, your kids will now be put up for adoption. Your family members will not be allowed to adopt them. Why? Because the State does not receive money for family related adoptions.

For each child that is adopted out, the State receives upwards of $85,000 from you guessed it, Title IV funding, or Social Security.

Some of these children are even sold to other Countries. For International adoptions the amount received is unknown at this point. It is kept very secret. A Former FBI agent is the one who discovered that this was happening.

What can YOU do?

There are several steps you can take to PREVENT your children from becoming targeted by CPS. Keep in mind the ones who are first targeted are relatively poor families. Being on any assistance can bring you unwanted attention. The second are large families, having 5 or more children will cause CPS to direct their attention your way. Because the amount of money that is involved, think about it, for 5 children they can get for your County between $15,000 and $25,000 per month, to start!! They particularly like to target 2 parent homes, because the children will be removed to foster care. If there is an ‘absent’ parent they are obligated to place the children in that home first, this will not net them any money so these families are over looked a lot of the time, even if ACTUAL abuse is noted.

1. The first thing you can do is put up a ‘No Trespassing’ sign on your property.

2. The next thing is a sign on your door “WARNING -ALL WHO ENTER ARE SUBJECT TO VIDEO SURVEILLANCE - YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!! Make sure you have a camera that can record on hand.

3. NEVER open the door to a stranger! If someone comes knocking at your door, step outside to talk to them. If you invite them in, that is all that is needed.

Keeping them at Bay

ALWAYS make sure you write down their identity and badge number if they have one. If you can get them to sign their name that they visited that’s even better!

More than likely if you have those first 3 in place they will think twice about attempting to enter your property. If you force them to get a warrant then you will have a little more protection from the law. Not much, but some.

On to the ‘next step’. If you are having a hard time with your bills and your electricity is on ‘shut off’ you may be subject to being under scrutiny. In a home that has no electricity or one that is having a hard time keeping up with the bills, CPS will find a way to wiggle in. It is felt that electricity is a ‘necessity’ unless you can prove that you have a few things in place your children may be taken away.

Emergency supplies

Battery operated lighting, flash lights, or even hurricane lamps (provided the fluid is kept safe and put up out of the reach of children) are a good thing to have should your electricity be shut off. A small propane cook stove (can be found in the camping gear area of your local Walmart). Bottled water. Water sanitizing tablets. Canned food, with non electric can opener. Powdered eggs (if you can find them) and powdered milk. A first aid kit. Extra blankets or sleeping bags. Think ’Disaster’ when implementing these types of things in your home. Keep them separate from your ’regular’ things, in a closet or storage area that the kids can’t get into. If a CPS or DHS worker comes into your home, you can show them your preparedness.

Keep a log and RECORD everything

If you MUST talk to them, make sure they are recorded! Make sure that you keep a log of ALL visits. It is a guarantee they will not want this. NEVER sign ANYTHING without first consulting with an Attorney. Always, always remember your 5th Amendment right!!!! The right to remain silent, UTILIZE this!!! They will threaten you, “If you don’t talk to me, I promise you will never see your children again”. Get this recorded or in writing. It is a PROMISE that anything you say WILL be used against you, no matter what you say!

In most cases when there is a false accusation a number of your civil rights are being abused. Find a Civil Rights Attorney, if you can’t afford one see if they will take your case pro-bono. This will be a ‘Civil’ case, an Attorney WILL NOT be provided for you, you MUST provide your own. IF you are charged with Criminal charges, then you will be provided with an Attorney if you cannot afford one. Both Civil and Criminal are two different cases and WILL NOT be combined.

Children or Puppies?

In the State where I live there is a website that has been created for those wishing to adopt children. It is a site where pictures of children are displayed with a bio describing the children. Most of the parents that I have talked to regarding this site are horrified because it gives the impression that the children are being auctioned off to the highest bidder. If your looking for a puppy then might you not do the same?

Newborn baby taken from mother because of a poppy seed bagel


Still not a Believer?

For those of you who are still skeptical of what I am saying go visit ‘you tube’ and type in CPS in the search bar, a multitude of various video’s will pop up. On face book there are MANY various sites that are trying to get help for parents who have had their children removed. Go to Google and type in Legally Kidnapped. There are many sites that can use your support, one day you may be on the chopping block from CPS, if you are prepared then you will begin to know where to turn.



John Van Doorn


John Van Doorn Runs for San Diego County Supervisor in 2010
http://angiemedia.com/2010/02/24/john-van-doorn-runs-for-san-diego-county-supervisor-in-2010/


John Van Doorn has announced he is running for San Diego County Supervisor in 2010. We believe he deserves strong consideration for your vote in the June 2010 primaries.

The corruption and abuse within the County of San Diego government threatens the well-being of the citizens and particularly children and parents of the county. Bill Horn, the incumbent candidate, has participated in hiding and continuing these abuses. Despite two decades of San Diego Grand Jury reports detailing how San Diego CPS has wrongly removed children from families, fabricated evidence, perjured, and acted in a malicious fashion against many parents and children, Bill Horn has not lifted a finger to correct these problems despite being a member of the County Board of Supervisors during this long era of egregious CPS misconduct.

2008 Campaign

In 2008, John Van Doorn ran for the County Board of Supervisors as a virtually unknown candidate against four-term supervisor Pam Slater-Price. Despite his newcomer status, he attained 30% of the vote.

I believe his strong showing in part came from sharing his views about how the County of San Diego is harming children and families and how he wants to stop this destruction. His personal experience with the corrupt and broken San Diego government and courts has educated him in the way the county hurts children and parents for a profit. He has seen in person the abusive conduct of County of San Diego Child Welfare Services (commonly referred to as San Diego CPS). He has been subjected to harm against his family by the broken San Diego County Superior Courts that fail to understand that children need both parents. It’s evident to him that the County of San Diego government has decided that declaring fit parents as child abusers or “bad parents” and tossing their children into foster care or sole custody are viewed as money-making opportunities. The county gets Federal Title IV payments for :
each child it takes from a family,
each parent it labels as an abuser, and
each child support case it opens up.

You and your children are but dollar signs to the County of San Diego. They care about their budget and jobs, not about your family. John Van Doorn says that he knows this well and wants to put an end to it.

Using Children To Pump Up Revenues

The County of San Diego has financial motivation to label you as a child abuser or a bad parent. That you have not abused or neglected your children or that you may have made a mistake that has CPS upset at you but did not seriously endanger any children doesn’t matter to them. The shocking truth is that San Diego CPS management predetermines the outcome of some “risk evaluations” to meet their financial goals. You can be declared a child abuser to have your children taken from you and put into foster care so that the County of San Diego can get paid by the federal government for doing it. They are likely to fight to keep your kids in foster care, even if there is no reasonable justification, as they “earn” federal Title IV-D revenues for each child in foster care.

John Van Doorn related in a conversation in January 2010 that this disgusting practice of predetermined risk evaluations was revealed to him by a CPS case worker as an explanation for why he couldn’t change a CPS report with false information and conclusions. He said his supervisor told him what the outcome would be before he even did the interviews. He explained that he could not change his report even though he knew the bruise on the child involved was from slipping in a bathtub and hitting the tub spout and that this has been verified by the interviews.

Van Doorn was alarmed and brought attention to this problem in a public meeting of the County Board of Supervisors. He explained how these practices hurt innocent parents and children who are in no danger. Instead of moving to correct the problem by ensuring CPS management stops this abusive profiteering, the CPS case worker who disclosed the abusive practices of CPS management was promptly fired.

Hiding Title IV Funding Dependencies Upon Abusing Families

CPS and the County of San Diego Board of Supervisors want to hide their very dirty secret that a large part of funding for county operations comes from abusing children and parents to get payments from the federal government. It doesn’t just involve foster care and child support, it even involves adoptions. For many years, by delaying or blocking adoptions, the county maintained its revenue stream for each child living under its “protection” in foster care. That foster care is statistically more dangerous than leaving children with their biological parents is well known but commonly ignored because putting children in foster care is more profitable and helps keep county social worker jobs secure.

When this problem became apparent to some in the federal government, rather than cracking down on the CPS family abusers, they passed a law allowing payments to county governments for each child they adopted out to make up for the revenue loss. Now adoptions are more often supported by San Diego County. It’s not because they realized that adoptions are generally better than leaving children in foster care until age 18 and then kicking them out on the streets. They are now more supportive because adoptions have become yet another revenue center for the county. Maximizing revenue involves:
- declaring parents child abusers,
- taking their kids and putting them into foster care, and then
- moving to terminate parental rights and
- adopt out the children.
This is the way County of San Diego Child Welfare Services (CPS) helps funds its own operations and that of other county agencies.

John Van Doorn wants to end this practice by substantial cuts in funding and employee count for the family-abusers in county government. Children who are in danger should still get help to ensure their safety, but children who are merely poor or needy or whose families are going through temporary difficulties shouldn’t be removed from their homes simply because the government can make a profit on them.

Broken Family Law and Juvenile Law Courts

This corruption spreads into the San Diego family law and juvenile courts. The judges know that they are expected to help fund county and court operations. They can do it by issuing unfair and punitive child custody and child support orders as part of the Title IV federal funding paid to the County of San Diego is for collecting and enforcing child support. Taking away children, dragging out trials for years, and abusing families are tactics they can use to help do their part to fund county operations.

Encouraging the use of psychological evaluators in cases in which they are not needed is another tactic that the local courts use to pass along dollars to their friends. Van Doorn has experience with this abuse, too. Despite a fair and impartial psychological evaluation by one psychologist that pointed out the good points and flaws in both parents, the courts allowed Van Doorn’s ex-wife to force a second psychological evaluation conducted by ill-reputed Dr. Stephen Doyne. Doyne was allegedly upset at Van Doorn for not being able to pay him because his assets were frozen by the court due to the divorce. Van Doorn pointed out that his ex-wife could pay, so it appears her payments got her the evaluation she wanted. The San Diego Superior Court rubber-stamped this corruption and the county benefits from it doing so as the county is paid by the federal government to place children primarily or solely with one parent to force the other parent to pay child support.

(from Custody Evaluator’s Credentials Questioned In Lawsuit)

John Van Doorn, a Doyne client, said “You have a certain expectation that the courts have vetted out the person they are appointing.”

San Diego family law courts have allowed Stephen Doyne to act as a court-appointed psychological evaluator even though he appears to have published questionable and allegedly fraudulent credentials and failed to file state-mandated disclosure and reporting forms required of all psychological evaluators. Doyne has earned the ire of many San Diego parents for allegedly biased evaluations and unethical business practices.

Some of the other section 730 psychological evaluators in the county have been critical of Doyne, expressing the opinion that Doyne is making a bad name for all psychologists involved in resolving child custody and divorce disputes in the county.

Too often the result of this type of corruption is that children are prevented from spending more or less equal time with each of their parents. The abuse of using a divorce or child custody case as a means to impede or terminate parent/child relationships is traditionally committed against fathers. But it sometimes happens to mothers, too. Whichever parent is the target, the children will suffer harm in virtually every case. Even when good evaluators spell out workable plans to keep both parents involved in the lives of their children, San Diego courts may misuse such evaluations in “winner takes all” decisions that ultimately harm the children and are extremely unfair to one of the parents.

Children need both parents. The government should get its fingers out of perverting children’s lives for its own financial gain. There is nothing fundamentally wrong with children who have adequate food, shelter, clothing, education, and medical care (which is the case with the vast majority of children) from spending equal time in each parent’s home and seeing that their parents have made different choices and have different lifestyles as a result. This would be far more beneficial to the children than yanking them away from one parent, damaging or destroying that child-parent relationship, and doing so to maximize the amount of child support to be paid and thereby maximizing the amount of Title IV funding that the County of San Diego will be paid to enforce these abuses.

New County Board of Supervisors Members Needed

The wrongs heaped upon San Diego children and parents will never stop with the current board members in place. As one of our authors wrote last year:

(from San Diego County Grand Jury Cites Further CPS Misconduct)

The failures and shortcomings in the CPS agency in the county have been brought to the attention of the Board of Supervisors repeatedly. Yet they do nothing effective to fix the problems, leaving CPS and its abusive staff free to continue to abuse the county’s children and parents.

There is no realistic doubt that the current San Diego County Board of Supervisors is substantially at fault for the abuses in the current system. Grand Jury reports have exposed the problems to them over and over again with substantial evidence of the misconduct of CPS and its sister child-abusing agencies. But little to no action is taken to correct the serious deficiencies.

The current Board of Supervisors consists of Greg Cox, Dianne Jacob, Pam Slater-Price, Ron Roberts, and Bill Horn. All five of the supervisors have been in office since 1995 or earlier, a period of time during which Grand Jury investigations have consistently shown that serious problems exist with CPS and that the agency blows off the recommendations to fix them on a routine basis.

The county supervisors have no incentive to clean up problems in the system because to do so, those problems must be discussed further. This is political risk-taking intolerable to them. They know they were in charge during this whole period of time and should have done something about the problems. Doing it now is effectively an admission that they were negligent in the past. Instead, they do all they can to bury these problems behind the scenes so that they are not politically damaged by their harmful and negligent conduct.

The county badly need new leadership to put an end to these problems and clean up the abuses and corruption.

John Van Doorn is a candidate who has stated that he intends to do exactly that. While he alone may not be enough to clean up the county, there’s no doubt in my mind that the alternative of re-electing Bill Horn will certainly lead to four more years of the same bad government.