CSIS Head Concerned that Canadian Politicians and Universities under the Sway of Foreign Governments

Canadian Security Intelligence Service [CSIS]

 Richard Fadden, the director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service

Foreign governments have infiltrated Canadian politics, CSIS head tells CBCCanwest News Service Tuesday, Jun. 22, 2010http://www.nationalpost.com/news/Foreign+governments+have+infiltrated+Canadian+politics+CSIS+head+tells/3188357/story.html

The head of Canada’s spy agency says foreign governments have infiltrated Canadian politics, CBC News reported Tuesday night.

“We’re in fact a bit worried in a couple of provinces that we have an indication that there are political figures who have developed quite an attachment to foreign countries,” Richard Fadden, the director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, told CBC.

Mr. Fadden said Cabinet ministers in two provinces, which he did not name, are under control of foreign governments. He said the politicians haven’t hidden their ties to foreign governments, and recently they’ve been shifting their policy decisions to reflect those relationships.

Mr. Fadden told the CBC that he has discussed with Canada’s privy council how best to tell those provincial governments that there may be a problem.

He added several members of municipal governments in British Columbia are also agents of influence for foreign countries, CBC reported.

There is no evidence that any federal politicians have been infiltrated, he said.

“A number of countries take the view that if they can develop influence with people relatively early in their careers they’ll follow them through. Before you know it, a country’s providing them with money, some sort of covert guidance,” Mr. Fadden said in his interview with CBC.

At least five countries, including China and Middle Eastern countries, are recruiting political prospects in universities, said CBC.



Some politicians under foreign sway: CSIS
June 23, 2010 - CBC NEWS

Canada's spy agency suspects that cabinet ministers in two provinces are under the control of foreign governments, CBC News has learned.

Several members of B.C. municipal governments are also under suspicion, Richard Fadden, the director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, told CBC News in an exclusive interview.
"We're in fact a bit worried in a couple of provinces that we have an indication that there's some political figures who have developed quite an attachment to foreign countries," Fadden said." The individual becomes in a position to make decisions that affect the country or the province or a municipality. All of a sudden, decisions aren't taken on the basis of the public good but on the basis of another country's preoccupations."

He said the politicians and public servants see it as a long-standing relationship and have no idea they are being used.

"There are several municipal politicians in British Columbia and in at least two provinces there are ministers of the Crown who we think are under at least the general influence of a foreign government."
Fadden said the agency is in the process of discussing with the Privy Council Office the best way to inform those provinces there may be a problem.

"We'll do the same with the public servants. I'm making this comment because I think it's a real danger that people be totally oblivious to this kind of issue."

Fadden warned that foreign regimes — through universities and social clubs — will develop a relationship with people who have a connection to the homeland.

"You invite somebody back to the homeland. You pay [for] their trips and all of a sudden you discover that when an event is occurring that is of particular interest to country "X," you call up and you ask the person to take a particular view," Fadden said.

At least five countries are surreptitiously recruiting future political prospects in universities, he said. Middle East countries are also involved.

But China is the most aggressive, funding university clubs that are managed by people operating out of the embassy or consulates, Fadden said in a recent speech to Canadian police chiefs and security experts in Toronto.

Chinese authorities also organize demonstrations against the Canadian government in respect to some of Canada's policies concerning China, Fadden said.

"A number of countries take the view that if they can develop influence with people relatively early in their careers, they'll follow them through," Fadden said. "Before you know it, a country is providing them with money, there's some sort of covert guidance."

Fadden said he is concerned that too much of the agency's resources are focused on fighting terrorism and not counter-espionage. That concentration leaves more chances to steal Canada's sensitive technology and trade secrets, worth billions of dollars a year.

"The difficulty I have, as does everybody, is you have to balance where you allocate resources, but it most definitely is as serious problem, and if I had to guess, I'd say it was going to get worse," Fadden said.
Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/politics/story/2010/06/22/spying-csis.html?ref=rss#ixzz0roagYqwU

PSYCHOLOGY: Parental Alienation

Parental Alienation

Under Construction

Why has Parental Alienation been rejected by every reputable organisation that's considered it?

Lack of Empirical Data, Research or Scientific Basis to Support the Controversial Psychological Theory Called Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS): PAS is Not Generally Accepted in the Scientific Community .

Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) Theory is not listed in the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) as a psychiatric disorder and is not recognized as a valid medical syndrome by the American Medical Association, or the American Psychological Association. (Dallam, 1999)

The American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Violence And The Family (1996) states that "no data" exist to support PAS. (Dallam, 1999)

According to Kelly and Johnston (2001), there is a lack of empirical support for PAS as a diagnostic entity.

Judge James Mize, Sacramento Superior Court, representing the California Judicial Council and the California Judges Association, testified before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee regarding parental alienation syndrome on May 6, 2003: "I have taught family law to judges. I have taught every single newly-appointed and newly-assigned family law judge in the State of California for the last eighteen months. .... I have told them (the last 120 judges who have been through this training) Parental Alienation Syndrome does not exist, it is not to be considered." * PAS is not based on systematic research. (Dallam, 1999)

"This [PAS theory] is junk science," said Dr. Paul Fink, a professor of psychiatry at Temple University School of Medicine and a past President of the American Psychiatric Association. "He [Dr. Richard Gardner] invented a concept and talked as if it were proven science. It's not." (Talan, 2003)

"PAS is not research-based, and it has done a great injustice to the family and the justice system," says Dr. Jon Conte, a psychologist at the University of Washington. He adds, "The criteria that Dr. Gardner has developed are virtually useless. He operates on the premise that if you say a lie often enough, people will believe it." (OMeara, 1999)

Dr. Eli Newberger, a Harvard University Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, states, This [parental alienation syndrome] is an atrocious theory with no science to back it up. (Talan, 2003)

Harvard's Dr. Eli Newberger, an assistant professor of pediatrics and an expert on child abuse, said he's been called on by state child protection agencies to evaluate ambiguous disclosures of abuse in divorce cases and believes that PAS deflects any real investigation into such allegations. (Talan, 2003)

Melbourne University Professor of Psychiatry Dr. Alasdair Vance agrees, saying PAS has no standing in mainstream psychiatry or medicine, "It is not helpful for the community to be hoodwinked by information that's not rigorously tested," he said. (Ellingsen, 2004)

But most mental health professionals say the label doesn't meet the definition of a psychiatric illness. It's not found in psychiatric textbooks on diagnoses.

In the late 1980s, when psychiatrists were revising the profession's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Dr. Robert Spitzer, who was leading the effort and is a Professor of Psychiatry at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons in Manhattan, said Gardner asked whether PAS could be included [in the DSM]. "It would never be taken seriously in DSM," Spitzer said in an interview. "It isn't a mental disorder." (Talan, 2003)